崔清田中国逻辑史研究学术成就概评  

Theoretical Features of Cui Qingtian’s Research on Chinese Logic History

作　　者：张学立[1] 齐昊 关兴丽[3] ZHANG Xueli;QI Hao;GUAN Xingli

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学逻辑、文化与认知研究中心,贵州贵阳550025 [2]贵州大学哲学与社会发展学院,贵州贵阳550025 [3]天津商业大学公共管理学院,天津300134

出　　处：《贵州民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2019年第2期113-128,共16页Journal of Guizhou Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Science

摘　　要：自20世纪80年代至21世纪初,崔清田在中国逻辑史研究领域吸收、反思前贤研究成果,同时又有诸多创新,学术成就卓著,成果丰富。2014年出版的国家重点图书出版规划项目成果《20世纪中国知名科学家学术成就概览?哲学卷》介绍了崔清田的学术成就。纵观崔清田中国逻辑史研究历程,其成就可概括为两个方面:其一、科学的研究方法。如果说梁启超“据西释中”是近代中国逻辑史研究方法的第一次转向,那么崔清田的“历史分析与文化诠释”可以说是当代中国逻辑史研究方法第二次转向,它摆脱了中国逻辑史研究困境,拓宽了中国逻辑史研究思路。其二、富于创见的研究成果。系统梳理名学、辩学;论述中国古代逻辑的特殊性、主导推理类型——推类和逻辑对文化的制约等。明确的问题意识是崔清田取得上述成就的直接原因。崔清田关于“逻辑和文化”的研究视角至今引领中国逻辑史研究方向。From the 1980s to the turn of the 21^st century,Mr.Cui Qingtian,a renowned expert in logic,has absorbed nutrients from previous and contemporary academic scholarships,making his own achievements outstanding.In 2014 his academic contributions were introduced in “Famous Chinese Scientists’ Academic Achievements in the 20^th Century:Philosophy”,a key national planned project.Mr.Cui’s excellent performance lies in two aspects.First,his scientific research methodology is “historic analysis and cultural interpretations”,the second turn in Chinese logic history research,different from Mr.Liang Qichao’s “interpretations of China through western perspectives” in the early 20^th century.Because of this turn,scholars get rid of research dilemma and widen their research paths.Second,Mr.Cui showed profound rich innovative ideas in his research.He systematically formulated the notions related to naming and argumentation,and illustrated the special and dominant inference types in ancient Chinese logic,that is,inference and the constraints of logic on culture.Clear problem orientation is the direct cause for his academic success.His perspective of “logic and culture” has been leading the research on Chinese logic history.

关 键 词：崔清田 历史分析与文化诠释 名学 辩学 推类 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]