卢梭与康德教育思想比较——基于人性论的视角  

A Comparison between Rousseau and Kant’s Educational Thoughts:In the Perspective of Human Nature

作　　者：朱凤琳 ZHU Fenglin(College of Political science and Law,Capital Normal University,Beijing 100048,China)

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学政法学院

出　　处：《东莞理工学院学报》2019年第4期121-126,共6页Journal of Dongguan University of Technology

摘　　要：在西方教育思想史上,卢梭和康德都是不可忽视的教育家。康德曾指出卢梭对人的本质的思考使其将关注点从自然世界转移到人的身上,但两者对人性的思考以及在此基础上形成的教育思想并不相同。卢梭从人性本善的观点出发,提出了自然主义教育理论,主张教育归于自然;康德虽受到影响但并未盲从于卢梭,提出了人性向善,从人的两重性引出教育的两重性,主张教育超越自然。本文从人性论的角度研究卢梭和康德各自的教育思想体系,并梳理两者思想的异同点。Rousseau and Kant are educators who can not be ignored in the history of the Western education thought.Kant pointed out that Rousseau’s thinking about human nature makes his focus from the natural world transferred to human being,but they are not the same as the thought of human nature and the educational thought on this basis.From the point of good human,Rousseau proposes the theory of naturalism education to comply with the nature;Although he was affected,Kant did not follow Rousseau blindly,and put forward that human nature should be turned into good,that the duality of education should be drawn from the duality of human beings,and that education should transcend nature.This article will try to study Rousseau and Kant’s educational ideology from the perspective of human nature,and sort out the similarities and differences between them.

关 键 词：卢梭 康德 人性论 教育思想 

分 类 号：G40-02[文化科学—教育学原理]