陆九渊视野中的王安石——以《荆国王文公祠堂记》为中心  

Wang Anshi in Lu Jiuyuan’s View——Centered on Jin Guo Wang Wen Gong Ci Tang Ji

作　　者：王建生[1] WANG Jian-sheng(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学文学院

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2019年第4期48-56,共9页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“靖康文史交叉研究”(17BZW093)

摘　　要：淳熙十五年(1188)正月,陆九渊写下了《荆国王文公祠堂记》。《祠堂记》通篇以议论为主,立论、驳论兼用,仅末段记述祠堂重修始末,深合“记”的文体特征。陆九渊对百年王安石地位升沉有所了解,他从大道传承谱系立论,赞扬王安石光明俊伟的人格,批评王安石不能发明本心、学之蔽而政事乖,褒中有贬,褒贬相间;并驳斥王安石乃亡国罪人的言论,认为王安石的排斥者及元祐诸君子等应承担过错和历史责任。《祠堂记》的论证逻辑,具有浓郁的陆氏学术色彩,尚本务简。在南宋尊程(洛学)贬王(新学)的文化语境中,陆九渊《祠堂记》系统而褒贬并行的评价方式,深具了解之同情,代表着知识界对王安石分而论之的共识。In the fifteenth year of the reign of Emperor Chunxi (1188),Lu Jiuyuan wrote Jin Guo Wang Wen Gong Ci Tang Ji .The Ci Tang Ji is mainly structured on comment,with argumentation and refutation.Only the last paragraph recorded the beginning and the end of the rebuilding of the temple,and it is in line with “Ji” style.Lu Jiuyuan had some understanding of the status of Wang Anshi in the past 100 years.He formed arguments based on the Dadao inheritance pedigree,and praised charisma and virtues of Wang Anshi,while criticized Wang Anshi for not enlightening the Original Mind and eventually violated politicalprinciples.There are both criticism and praise.Moreover,he refuted the claim that Wang Anshi was the sinner of the country and he believed that Wang Anshi’s opponents and Yuanyou members should be blamed and take their historical responsibility .The argument logic of Ci Tang Ji has a strong academic style of Lu,that is conform to the principle of simplicity and nature.In the cultural context of praising Cheng Theory(Luo xue) and depreciating Wang Theory (Xin Xue)in Southern Song Dynasty,the systematic and praise-criticize combined evaluation method of Lu Jiuyuan’ s Ci Tang ji ,has a deep understanding of sympathy.And it represents that the intellectual community has a consensus on Wang Anshi’s separate discussions.

关 键 词：王安石 陆九渊 《荆国王文公祠堂记》 分而论之 

分 类 号：B244.8[哲学宗教—中国哲学]