我国远程教育研究2018年度进展报告  

2018 Annual Review on Distance Education Research of China

作　　者：郭允建[1] 朱祖林[1] 刘盛峰 汤诗华[1] 毕磊[1] Guo Yunjian;Zhu Zulin;Liu Shengfeng;Tang Shihua;Bi Lei(Distance Education Research Center, Anhui Radio and TV University, Hefei Anhui 230022)

机构地区：[1]安徽广播电视大学远程教育研究中心

出　　处：《远程教育杂志》2019年第5期13-23,共11页Journal of Distance Education

基　　金：安徽省高校人文社会科学研究重点项目“基于学生体验的远程教育质量评价研究(SK2017A1023)”、“成人远程学习者专业认同的理论与实证研究(SK2017A1024)”、“远程教育精准扶贫的实施策略与受众获得感评价研究(SK2019A0836)”;安徽省高校优秀青年人才支持计划项目“远程教育教师职业倦怠的测评研究(gxyq2018164)”的研究成果

摘　　要：沿用本系列研究的总体设计,采用文献法、内容分析法、社会网络分析法等,对2018年度我国远程教育研究文献,进行计量分析与述评。(1)研究主题的分布在持续冷热不均中略有变化,远程教与学、学习者、资源、管理和评价是本年度热点主题,技术与媒体、应用等主题新增若干热门微观话题;(2)规范研究方法的应用占比与上年度持平,定性研究占比持续走低;(3)研究主体以普通高校等非远程教育机构为主的格局没有明显改变。我国远程教育研究中存在的冷热主题持续极化、定性研究占比持续下降、学术研究与实践办学的主体分离等问题,亟待业界反思与改进。According to the design of our series of research,the status of distance education research of China in 2018 is quantitatively analyzed and reviewed by means of literature research,content analysis and social network analysis. We found that:(1) The distribution of research topics is slightly changed in the continuous hot and cold extreme. Distance teaching and learning,learner,resource,management,evaluation are the annual hot topics. Some micro-hot topics are emerging in technology and media,and application of distance education.(2) The proportion of application of normative research methods is the same as last year,but the qualitative research continues to decline.(3) There is no significant change in the pattern that the researchers mainly come from non-distance educational institutions such as regular colleges and universities. Several problems are urgently needed to reflect and improve. For example,the distribution of hot and cold topics continues to be extreme,the proportion of qualitative research continues to decline,the separation between principal researchers and principal practitioners.

关 键 词：远程教育 年度进展 研究主题 研究方法 研究主体 

分 类 号：G728[文化科学—成人教育学]