高等教育质量管理的层次与品质  

作　　者：董云川 DONG Yun-chuan

机构地区：[1]云南大学高等教育研究院,昆明650091

出　　处：《大学教育科学》2019年第5期9-10,4,122,共4页University Education Science

摘　　要：论及教育品质,我这里先从管理的逻辑讲起。“管理”分为三个层次,第一个层次是“管”,效果指向于管住;第二个层次是“理”,效果指向于理活;第三个层次是“安”,效果指向于安定。我们的高等教育疏离了第三个层次,懈怠于第二个层次,过分着力于第一个层次,关心的重点往往是“进一步加强管理”,大家时刻都在操心怎样把大学里的学生、老师管住和管好。时下,人人热衷于一流、大家都要高大上、处处呼唤卓越、随时随地创新。The quality and evaluation of higher education is an eternal topic. In general, the evaluation of higher education quality includes five elements: evaluation guiding ideology, evaluation index system, evaluation procedure, evaluation subject and evaluation results. At present, the evaluation index system of higher education quality in China is not scientific enough. Especially, the evaluation of undergraduate teaching is not guided by the fundamental values for improving the quality of personnel training. Therefore, the new index system still lacks the scheme of indicators that are necessary to encourage the innovative and quality personnel training. The quality of higher education is facing five trends of development: from adaptation to guidance, from techniques to humanity, from intelligence to wisdom, from knowledge to thinking, and from process to result. A deep understanding of these trends and related problems is of great significance for improving the quality of higher education and promoting the development of higher education. From the perspective of quality management of higher education, "management" can be divided into three levels: the first level is "management", with the effect pointing to control; the second level is "reason", with the effect pointing to rationalization; and the third level is "security", with the effect pointing to stability. The major shortcomings of higher education lie in its alienation from "safety", lack of "reason" and excessive focus on "management", which marks higher education far from quality construction. Facing the new requirements of higher education development in the new era such as the supplier of public goods in higher education, we need to rethink the past and accommodate the shortcomings to construct a most suitable quality construction and evaluation system for higher education that guides and optimizes the demand, adheres to the spiritual quality, and provides the society with more effective and more suitable higher education supply. At present, in the constr

关 键 词：教育质量管理 教育品质 高等教育 指向 “理” “安” 学生 大学 

分 类 号：G649.2[文化科学—高等教育学]