大学英语写作智能反馈和教师反馈的对比研究  

A Comparative Study of AWE Feedback and Teacher Feedback on University Students’ English Writing

作　　者：余薇[1] YU Wei(Guangdong University of Finance,Guangzhou Guangdong 510521,China)

机构地区：[1]广东金融学院

出　　处：《湖北开放职业学院学报》2019年第22期186-189,共4页Journal of Hubei Open Vocational College

基　　金：广东省高等教育教学改革项目“基于移动终端的混合式英语写作教学模式的构建与实践”(项目编号:粤教高函[2018]180)

摘　　要：近年来,随着写作自动评测系统的研发,智能评阅反馈开始广泛应用于高校英语教学中,大有取代传统的教师反馈之势。研究者对广东某高校的两班英语专业学生分别采用智能写作评阅系统(iWrite)反馈和教师反馈方式,通过文本分析、问卷调查和访谈等方法,对比分析两种反馈方式对学生英语作文质量的影响,结果发现:①智能评阅系统所提供的反馈意见点数量远远少于教师反馈意见点数量,且多集中于语言错误反馈;②教师反馈能够引导学生对作文进行内容、结构和语言上的修改,在提高学生当前作文整体质量方面比智能反馈更有效;③智能反馈能更有效地提高学生后期作文的整体质量。鉴于两种反馈方式各有优劣,高校英语教师在英语写作教学中应合理结合两种反馈方式,以更好地发挥反馈意见的作用。With the development of Automated Writing Evaluation(AWE), automated algorithm-derived feedback has been increasingly adopted in English teaching in universities, seemly overwhelming teacher feedback. In two different classes of English majors of a university in Guangdong province, the researcher adopted the feedback from the AWE website iWrite and teacher feedback respectively. By collecting data from students’ essays, a questionnaire and interviews, the researcher compared the effects of AWE feedback and teacher feedback on revising students’ essays. The findings are as follows:①AWE feedback provides far smaller amount of feedback points than teacher feedback does and AWE feedback is confined mainly to grammar;②Teacher feedback can instruct students to revise their essays in terms of content, structure and language, with which students’ current essays are revised much better than those with AWE feedback;③AWE feedback can help improve the overall quality of students’ subsequent essays. Given that both types of feedback have their merits and demerits, teachers in universities are supposed to blend the feedback reasonably in EFL classroom.

关 键 词：智能写作评阅系统 智能反馈 教师反馈 英语写作 

分 类 号：G642[文化科学—高等教育学]