中美高校应急管理专业的课程设置比较分析  

A Comparative Analysis of Curriculum Design of Universities’ “Emergency Management” Majors in the United States and China

作　　者：韩承鹏[1] HAN Chengpeng

机构地区：[1]上海理工大学管理学院

出　　处：《煤炭高等教育》2019年第4期38-42,共5页Meitan Higher Education

摘　　要：中美两国高校应急管理专业在课程内容设置与评价方面存在差异。中国高校偏重管理学与社会学领域的理论课程,对实践环节重视不够,而美国高校设置了大量理论与实践相结合的课程;中国高校主要依靠理论考试成绩来评定学生学业,而美国高校则主要依据实践成绩来评定。办学时间短、经费不充足是我国应急管理专业教育的现状。借鉴美国经验、改善办学条件、改进课程设置等是提高我国应急管理专业教育质量的主要途径。There are differences in content setting and evaluation of universities’“Emergency Management”courses in United States(US)and China.Universities in China lay more emphasis on theoretical courses in management and sociology,but pay less attention to practical courses,while universities in the United States set up a lot of courses combining theory and practice.Compared with students’practical results in US universities,Chinese universities evaluate students’academic performance mainly based on theoretical test scores.Short running time and insufficient funds are the current situation of“emergency management”education in China.The main way to improve the quality of“emergency management”education are to learn from the experience of the United States,and improve the conditions of running a school and improve the curriculum.

关 键 词：应急管理专业 课程设置 学业评定 中国高校 美国高校 

分 类 号：G649[文化科学—高等教育学]