检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘洵[1] PAN Xun(School of Foreign Languages,Literature and International Exchange,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310058,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江大学外国语言文化与国际交流学院
出 处:《乐山师范学院学报》2020年第2期90-95,共6页Journal of Leshan Normal University
摘 要:日本学者根据时间与主体的不同,将倭寇分为“前期倭寇”与“后期倭寇”,前期倭寇如字面之所示基本属实,但后期倭寇的提法却很有问题。实际上日本学者这样做的目的并不单纯,其一是为了推卸当年倭寇劫掠中国东南沿海的历史责任,再者就是淡化丰臣秀吉侵略朝鲜的历史影响,因此中国学者在接受与使用日本学者创造的名词时,应该慎之又慎。Japanese scholars have categorized Japanese pirates by times and subjects,and put forward two concepts——"the early Japanese pirates"and"the later Japanese pirates".The former term is basically true,while the latter one is highly questionable.Attention should be drawn to the hidden intentions:on one hand,Japanese scholars want to evade the historical responsibility for Japanese pirates'destroy on the coastal areas of Southeast China;on the other hand,they intend to underplay the historical impacts of Hideyoshi Toyotomi invading Korea.Therefore,we Chinese scholars shall be cautious when we accept and use the terms created by Japanese scholars.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30