现代诠释学类型阐论  

On the Types of Modern Hermeneutics

作　　者：傅永军[1] Fu Yongjun

机构地区：[1]山东大学中国诠释学研究中心暨哲学与社会发展学院,济南250100

出　　处：《中国社会科学》2020年第3期44-61,205,共19页Social Sciences in China

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“比较视阈下中国经典诠释传统现代化路径研究”(14AZD092)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：德国学者舒尔茨将现代诠释学划分为三种类型:技艺诠释学、诠释哲学和哲学诠释学。舒尔茨的划分富有洞见,但却证明不力,缺乏哲学根据。从存在论上说,现代诠释学从方法论诠释学转型发展为存在论诠释学,同时伴随着其哲学基础从传统实体存在论向着现象学存在论的转换,存在论立场上的差异是导致现代诠释学分化出不同类型的源发根据。从理解功能的规范解释上说,不同类型诠释学有着不同的认知取向,并随之生成不同的自我理解。技艺诠释学关注“正确理解”,诠释哲学关注“理解何为”,而哲学诠释学则致力探究“理解的条件”,回答理解如何可能这个更为根本的哲学问题。对现代诠释学进行类型研究,有助于澄清诠释学概念,了解现代诠释学家族的复杂性,把握现代诠释学的意义,推动中国诠释学研究的多样化发展。The German scholar R.Schulz divides modern hermeneutics into three types:technical hermeneutics,hermeneutic philosophy and philosophical hermeneutics.Schulz’s division is insightful,but lacks cogent proof and philosophical grounds.From the ontological perspective,modern hermeneutics has developed from methodological hermeneutics to ontological hermeneutics,accompanied by the transformation of its philosophical basis from traditional entity-based ontology to phenomenological ontology.The difference in ontological positions is the very source of the different types of modern hermeneutics.From the perspective of normative interpretation of their understanding functions,different types of hermeneutics have different cognitive orientations,and thus produce different forms of self-understanding.Technical hermeneutics focuses on“correct understanding,”hermeneutic philosophy is concerned with“what understanding is for,”while philosophical hermeneutics pays attention to“the conditions for understanding”and answers the more fundamental philosophical question of how understanding is possible.Research on the types of modern hermeneutics is helpful for clarifying the concept of hermeneutics,for understanding the complexity of modern hermeneutics,for grasping the significance of modern hermeneutics,and for promoting the diversified development of Chinese hermeneutics.

关 键 词：现代诠释学 类型 技艺诠释学 诠释哲学 哲学诠释学 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]