伦敦政治经济学院通识课程设置与启示  

Implications from the Setting of General Education Curriculum of the London School of Economics and Political Science

作　　者：常诚 江晓东[1] 杨舒婷[2] CHANG Cheng;JIANG Xiaodong;YANG Shuting(Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433,China;East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China)

机构地区：[1]上海财经大学,上海200433 [2]华东师范大学,上海200062

出　　处：《扬州大学学报（高教研究版）》2020年第1期58-66,共9页Journal of Yangzhou University（Higher Education Study Edition）

基　　金：2018年上海财经大学重大教学改革项目“经济分析类通识课程教学改革研究”(2018120044);2019年上海高校本科重点教改项目“通识‘金课’质量标准与评价指标体系研究”(2018120292)。

摘　　要：通识课程是通识教育得以实施的载体。近年来,随着通识教育越来越受到高校的重视,通识课程也成为高校课程体系的重要组成部分。考察伦敦政治经济学院的人才培养目标、课程体系和设置,对我国商科院校的通识课程建设颇有启示。商科院校在通识课程建设中应围绕学校人才培养目标进行合理规划,突出商科特色;促进通识课程与专业课程相融合;设置综合性通识必修课程;打破重人文轻应用的观念;去除通识课程考核的功利性。General education curriculums are the carrier of general education. In recent years, general education is receiving more and more attention in the field of higher education and general education curriculums have become an important part of university curriculum system. It is of referential significance for China’s commercial universities to investigate the training objectives, curriculum system and settings of the London School of Economics and Political Science. In Chinese universities, business colleges should make proper arrangement of general education curriculums by taking into consideration the school-level goal of training talents and highlighting the features of business courses. Besides, general education courses and professional courses should be integrated;comprehensive general education curriculums should be set up;application-oriented courses should be in no way inferior to humanity-based courses;utilitarian assessment should be removed from general education curriculums.

关 键 词：通识教育 通识课程建设 英国高等教育 

分 类 号：G649.3[文化科学—高等教育学] G561[文化科学—教育学]