检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邢玉瑞[1] XING Yu-rui(Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine,Xianyang 712046,China)
机构地区:[1]陕西中医药大学中医药文化文献研究院,咸阳712046
出 处:《中华中医药杂志》2020年第4期1663-1665,共3页China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(No.2013CB532002);陕西中医药大学学科创新团队项目(No.2019-YL01)。
摘 要:2018年中医思维研究呈现出开放、多元的态势,取得了一定的进展。但中医思维研究需要集多学科知识于一个研究者个体,难度较大,故研究中存在着基本概念不清、逻辑混乱、夸大象思维价值、中医思维方法体系框架欠缺以及临床思维方法研究薄弱等诸多问题。笔者提出今后中医思维方法研究应注意补上思维科学、逻辑学、认知科学、心理学、中国古代哲学、系统科学等基础知识的缺陷,厘清基本概念,明晰逻辑关系,加强顶层设计,开展团队协作,以提升研究水平。There has been an open and diversified trend in the study of TCM thinking mode in 2018,and the study of which has made some progress.However,plenty of problems such as ambiguous basic concept,confused logic,exaggeration of the value of image mode,lack of frame of TCM thinking mode and deficiency of the study on clinical thinking method still exist in the study of TCM thinking mode,because it requires mastery of multidisciplinary knowledge in one researcher,imposing great difficulties.This paper put forward that in the following study of TCM thinking mode,basic knowledge such as thought science,logic,cognitive science,psychology ancient Chinese philosophy and systematic science should be added in the study of TCM thinking model,so that the research level can be improved by straitening up the basic concepts,clarifying logical relationship,strengthening top-level designing and carrying out group cooperation.
分 类 号:R22[医药卫生—中医基础理论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.15.225.105