概念标记和语用标记三维协同作用及发展研究  

Tridimensional alignment effects and development of ideational and pragmatic markers

作　　者：肖好章[1] 尹晓霞[1] 刘崚嵘[2] Xiao Haozhang;Yin Xiaoxia;Liu Lingrong

机构地区：[1]华南农业大学外国语学院,广东广州510642 [2]华南农业大学农博馆,广东广州510642

出　　处：《外语教学》2020年第4期7-11,共5页Foreign Language Education

基　　金：教育部人文社科规划项目基金“生态语境化第二语言发展研究”(项目编号:18YJA740056)的部分研究成果。

摘　　要：本文在概念和语用标记及其连续体研究基础上,探讨了该连续体与互文语篇和语境三维协同下的作用和发展。话语标记(简称"语标")、语篇和语境及其三个语体水平构成三维协同连续体。三维协同实验结果显示:1)概念标记与书面语篇(境)显性协同促听效果不显著,但语用标记与口语对话语篇(境)显性协同促听作用显著;2)三维连续体协同学习对话语标记尤其语用标记产出作用显著,实验组优于对照组;话语标记尤其语用标记产出效果与对话听力理解(简称"听解")成绩关系成正比;3)两组都存在概念-语用标记连续体发展特征,但实验组连续体协同效果更接近本族语人原文。研究结果验证了二语语标经与三维连续体协同由概念向语用演化的语境化发展规律。This article,based on the prior studies on the ideational and pragmatic markers and their continuum,explores their effects and development aligned with intertext and intertextual contexts.Markers,text,and context and their respective levels of styles form a tridimensionally aligned continuum.Application of this continuum shows:1)significant effect of pragmatic markers aligned with conversational texts and contexts except that of the ideational markers aligned with witten ones has been found on listening comprehension;2)significant differences exist in the outcomes of spoken discourse/pragmatic markers with the experimental group outperforming the comparison group;and the relationship is proportional between the output of pragmatic markers and the effect of conversational listening comprehension;and 3)the ideational-pragmatic continuum development characterizes the both groups despite the more native-likeness of the experimental group.Thus,the findings verify the development law of interlanguage markers,i.e.,the contextualized development of markers from ideational to pragmatic,aligned in the tridimensional continuum.

关 键 词：概念标记 语用标记 协同 三维连续体 语用习得 语境化 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]