中外《道路几何设计》课程教学模式与教学理念对比分析  

A Comparative Analysis of Teaching Model and Teaching Idea of Roads Geometric Design in Chinese and Foreign Countries

作　　者：王龙[1] 解晓光[1] WANG Long;XIE Xiao-guang(School of Science and Engineering on Transportation,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150090,China)

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨工业大学交通科学与工程学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150090

出　　处：《教育教学论坛》2020年第35期296-298,共3页Education And Teaching Forum

摘　　要：通过HIT在《道路几何设计》与UIUC Geometric Design of Roads课程的系统对比分析可知,在教学理念和课程设置方面,UIUC比较注重理论知识的讲述和协作精神的培养,而HIT不仅注重学生理论知识的掌握,而且更注重实践环节和独立的工作能力培养;从课堂理论教学的主体内容上看,HIT强化学生的实践能力和知识面的扩展,而UIUC则侧重用如何优化设计;在两校的课堂教学模式方面,HIT应用的元素丰富,课堂气氛轻松活跃,以教师引导为主,而UIUC课堂教学重在逻辑性与条理性,课堂气氛以学生提问为主。可以看出,HIT和UIUC无论是课程设置、教学理念、教学方法和评价方法都具有一定的先进性与合理性,体现了两国学生就业方式和学习态度的差异。By a comparative analysis of the courses on Geometric Design of Roads of HIT and UIUC,we can see that in terms of teaching ideas and curriculum,UIUC pays more attention to the explain of theoretical knowledge and the cultivation of cooperative spirit,but HIT not only pays attention to the mastery of students'theoretical knowledge,but also to the cultivation of practical links and independent working ability;in terms of the classroom teaching models of the two schools,HIT applies richer elements,the classroom atmosphere is relaxed and active,and the teachers are the main guide,while the UIUC classroom teaching focuses more on logic and organization,and the classroom teaching is based on students'questions.Through the comparative study,it is found that HIT and UIUC both have advantages in curriculum settings,teaching ideas,teaching methods and evaluation methods,which reflect the differences of students'employment model and learning attitude between the two countries.

关 键 词：道路几何设计 课程设置 教学内容 教学理念 教学方法 差异性 

分 类 号：G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学]