湛若水与王阳明“格物”思想比较  

A Comparative Study on the Idea of“gewu”of Zhan Ruoshui and Wang Yangming

作　　者：赵絮颖 ZHAO Xu-ying(Department of Philosophy,Nanjing University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210046,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学哲学系,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《河北北方学院学报（社会科学版）》2020年第4期23-26,98,共5页Journal of Hebei North University：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：王阳明与湛若水之所以就“格物”问题展开争辩主要是由于两者在某种程度上对对方思想有所误解。湛若水忽视了王阳明的“格物”在端正意念之余更强调对于实践的矫正;而王阳明也误认为湛若水的“格物”只是向万物寻求天理,未重视湛若水所讲的向外推致本心之义。在工夫论上,王阳明就天理之存有而言的“主一个天理”与湛若水就天理之妙运而言的“无一物可主”并不冲突。此外,王阳明更加注重“必有事焉”的实际践履,湛若水则侧重于“勿忘勿助”的省察工夫,但对两者而言,“必有事焉”与“勿忘勿助”均不可偏废。The debate between Zhan Ruoshui and Wang Yangming around the idea of“gewu”is presumably caused by their misunderstandings of each other’s thoughts.Zhan fails to find that Wang’s idea of“gewu”prefers to emphasize the correction of practice rather than the correction of ideas,while Wang misunderstands Zhan’s idea of“gewu”as the pursuit of truth in everything rather than the extension to one’s conscience.

关 键 词：格物 致良知 随处体认天理 主一 勿忘勿助 

分 类 号：B248[哲学宗教—中国哲学]