检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:顾永琦[1] 李加义 GU Yongqi;LI Jiayi
机构地区:[1]新西兰惠灵顿维多利亚大学语言学与应用语言研究学院
出 处:《外语教育研究前沿》2020年第4期57-63,92,共8页Foreign Language Education in China
摘 要:有效的形成性评估对促进教学具有深远影响。然而,面向学习的形成性评估并不会自动促成学生的进步,形成性评估同样需要效度验证。本文简要介绍形成性评估的效度与效度验证,并着重阐述如何使用基于论证的效度验证框架以验证形成性评估的效度,为形成性评估的研究人员以及一线教师的评估实践提供切实可行的效度验证方法。Formative assessment has often been used interchangeably with assessment for learning.Due to its learning-oriented nature,validity has almost been taken for granted.As a result,discussion of validation procedures for formative assessment remains a rarity in the field.We contend that formative assessment does not automatically lead to student learning improvement,and that validation is needed in order to ensure the successful use of formative assessment.This article outlines an argument-based validation framework that will guide the validation practices of researchers and teachers.An example is used to illustrate the four major claims and inferential chains for the Interpretation and Use Argument.The Toulmin framework is next presented to illustrate a Validity Argument for one of the claims.It is hoped that this coherent and practical validation framework will help teachers become more aware of the qualities of their own formative assessment practices.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222