检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王定安[1] WANG Ding’an
出 处:《北京行政学院学报》2021年第1期121-128,共8页Journal of Beijing administration institute
摘 要:当今学界关于儒家“超越性”的争论,因言说方式缺乏分层,故多有混淆。实际上,该话题肇始于明清之际,是耶儒双方围绕着“因性”与“超性”问题而展开的交流实践。重回明清之际,梳理阿奎那关于“超越”术语的几种用法,比较耶儒双方关于“超越性”的言说方式,可以发现儒家并非以神为中心进行自上而下的言说,而是从现实出发,对“超越性”问题进行自下而上的回溯。The current scholarship’s debate about the“transcendence”of Confucianism is often confused be⁃cause of the lack of methodization in the way of expression.In fact,this topic started in the Ming-Qing transi⁃tion period,and it was the communicative practice between Christianity and Confucianism around the issue on“the natural”and“the supernatural”.Tracing back to the the Ming-Qing transition period again,this article sorts out Aquinas’s usages of the term“transcendence”,and compares the Christian and Confucian way of ex⁃pression about“transcendence”.It can be found that Confucianism does not express a God-centered“transcen⁃dence”from top to bottom,but retrospects this issue from bottom to top by proceeding from the reality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.106.4