检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛青[1] 杨莹雪[1] 陈佳 王红星[1] 叶静[1] 王玉平[1] Xue Qing;Yang Yingxue;Chen Jia;Wang Hongxing;Ye Jing;Wang Yuping(Department of Neurology,Xuanwu Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing Key Laboratory of Regulation and Treatment of Brain Functional Diseases,Beijing Institute of Major Brain Diseases,Beijing 100053,China)
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学宣武医院神经内科,北京脑功能疾病调控治疗重点实验室,北京脑重大疾病研究院,100053
出 处:《神经疾病与精神卫生》2020年第11期817-819,共3页Journal of Neuroscience and Mental Health
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81501119);2018年北京市临床重点专科项目。
摘 要:目的探讨案例教学法(CBL)相对于常规教学在住院医师规范化培养癫痫学习中的应用效果。方法回顾2018—2020年在宣武医院癫痫亚专科轮转学习的50名住院医师,其中2018年入科的25名为常规教学组,2019年入科的25名为CBL教学组。常规教学组采用传统教学模式,CBL教学组采用CBL教学模式,学习时间均为3个月。最后以理论考试、实践考试和问卷调查作为评估手段。结果CBL教学组住院医师的理论考试成绩和常规教学组差异无统计学意义[CBL教学组(89.8±3.1)分,常规教学组(89.7±2.7)分;t=0.14,P=0.89],但实践考试成绩明显优于常规教学组[CBL教学组(89.2±2.6)分,常规教学组(85.1±2.3)分;t=5.98,P<0.05]。问卷调查结果显示接受CBL模式教学的住院医师自我评价对癫痫学习的兴趣更浓厚,学习主动性更高,临床思维能力提升更明显。结论CBL教学法对癫痫亚专科住院医师培养更有优势,利于培养其临床思维,增强临床诊疗能力,使得住院医师能较高水平完成规范化培养大纲要求的任务,也增加了住院医师的学习满意度。Objective To explore the application effect of case-based learning(CBL)method in standardized training of residents in epilepsy learning compared with conventional education mode.Methods A total of 50 residents who rotated in the Epilepsy Sub-specialty of Xuanwu Hospital from 2018 to 2020 were divided into two groups.Among them,25 residents enrolled in 2019 were the CBL teaching group and received the CBL education mode.25 residents enrolled in 2018 were the conventional teaching group and received conventional teaching mode.The study period of both groups lasted for 3 months.At the end,there were theoretical examination,practical examination and questionnaire survey as evaluation methods.Rusults There was no statistically significant difference in theoretical examination scores between CBL teaching group and conventional teaching group[CBL teaching group(89.8±3.1),conventional teaching group(89.7±2.7);t=0.14,P=0.89],but the practical examination scores of the CBL teaching group were significantly better than those of the conventional teaching group[CBL teaching group(89.2±2.6),conventional teaching group(85.1±2.3);t=5.98,P<0.05].The results of the questionnaire survey showed that residents who accepted CBL teaching mode had more interest in epilepsy learning,higher learning initiative and more obvious improvement of clinical thinking ability.Conclusions CBL teaching method has more advantages in the training of epilepsy subspecialist residents,which is conducive to cultivate their clinical thinking and enhance their ability of clinical diagnosis and treatment.It enables the residents to complete the tasks required by the standardized training program at a higher level,and increases their learning satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68