“四书”学术形态的历史演变  

The Historical Evolution of the Academic Form of“the Four Books”

作　　者：朱汉民[1] ZHU Han-min(Yuelu Academy,Hunan University,Changsha 410082)

机构地区：[1]湖南大学岳麓书院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《广西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2021年第2期123-130,共8页Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目:《宋学源流》(19ZDA028)。

摘　　要：早期儒学曾经制作了六经之学、诸子之学与传记之学的不同形态。六经、诸子、传记不仅是文献形态的不同,学术地位也有极大差别。但是在儒学史上,《论语》《大学》《中庸》《孟子》四书的文献形态先后发生变化,春秋战国时期它们是诸子之学,两汉时代是六经的传记之学,到了两宋时期演变为与“六经”同等地位甚至更加重要的经典体系即“四书”之学。在千年儒学史上,“四书”的学术形态不断变化,源于其思想内容的不断变化。Early Confucianism once produced different forms of the Six Classics,doctrines of Pre-Qin sages,and commentary learning of Confucianism-to integrate the two different academic forms-classics and commentaries-into an organic ideological system.The three sorts are not only different in literature form,but also in academic status.The literature form of the Analects of Confucius,the Great Learning,the Doctrine of the Mean and Mencius,in the history of Confucianism,has changed one after another.In the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period,the four books fell into the doctrines of the sages,while in the Han Dynasty,they were shifted to the commentary learning of the Six Classics.Next in the Song Dynasty,they enjoyed equal status as the Six Classics,and even evolved into the studies of the Four Books,the Confucianism classics,thus weighing more.Its constant changes in literature form over the thousand year history of Confucianism results from the constant change of its ideological content.

关 键 词：儒学 六经 诸子 传记 《四书》学 

分 类 号：B21[哲学宗教—中国哲学]