学科标准的审思与学科政策的突围——化解高等教育学学科危机的两个向度  

Reflection on Discipline Standards and Breakthrough of Discipline Policies——Two Dimensions to Resolve the Disciplinary Crisis of Higher Education

作　　者：付八军 龚放[2] FU Ba-jun;Gong Fang(College of Teacher Education,University,Shaoxing 312000,China;Institute of Education,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China)

机构地区：[1]绍兴文理学院教师教育学院,浙江绍兴312000 [2]南京大学教育研究院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《高等教育研究》2021年第3期54-59,共6页Journal of Higher Education

基　　金：浙江省哲学社会科学领军人才培育课题(21QNYC20ZD)。

摘　　要：我国高等教育学的学科性危机包含学科标准的危机与学科政策的危机。学科标准的危机是整个教育学科共有的危机,并非高等教育学独自面对。从学科标准审思的向度出发,高等教育学学人需要放弃对传统"三独立"学科标准的追求,而将重心转移到对现实问题的关注,提高研究的问题意识和社会贡献度。学科政策的危机主要指"按一级学科进行规划与建设"引发的危机,这是我国高等教育学面对的特殊性危机。从学科政策突围的向度推动中国特色高等教育学的科学化进程,要么通过完善学科专业目录,争取将高等教育学列为"一级学科";要么拓宽学科研究基础和领域,打造实实在在的一级学科。China higher education discipline is facing the dual crisis:academic standards and academic policies.With respect to academic standards of the crisis,is the common crisis in the whole education discipline.Higher education discipline must give up effort and response to traditional"three independent"discipline standard,shift to the study of practical issues,and improve the social contribution of scientific research.As for academic policy of the crisis,it is mainly based on the policy of the first-level discipline.It may be the specific crisis of China higher education discipline.To resolve the academic policy of the crisis,it should improve the discipline catalogue,and make higher education become a first-level discipline;or it should widen the field of education discipline,and construct a real first-level discipline.

关 键 词：高等教育学 学科危机 学科标准 学科政策 

分 类 号：G640[文化科学—高等教育学]