经学潜流:夏曾佑、刘师培编纂历史教科书的学源探析  

The Undercurrent of Classical Studies:A Scholarly Analysis on History Textbooks Compiled by Xia Zeng-you and Liu Shi-pei

作　　者：罗检秋[1] 徐凤 LUO Jian-qiu;XU Feng(Institute of Modern History,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100101,China;School of Marxism,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院近代史研究所,北京100101 [2]北京林业大学马克思主义学院,北京100083

出　　处：《安徽史学》2021年第3期72-79,共8页Historical Research In Anhui

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“社会史视野中的近代经学研究”(19AZS013)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：清代道咸以降,学术格局发生了深刻变化,经学相对于乾嘉时期总体上渐趋式微,而史学有所更新和发展。但值得注意的是,晚清民国的经学不仅论著繁多,而且对史学、子学乃至文学领域的影响并未消退。夏曾佑、刘师培是清末“新史学”的主要实践者,而经学渊源不同,史学观点也多差异。其所撰历史教科书尤为典型地体现了经学传统的深层影响,反映了清末经、史之学的复杂关联。In the post-Daoguang and Xianfeng period of the Qing Dynasty,the academic landscape had changed deeply.Classical studies were overall declining,while historiography became renovated and developed,in comparison with those during the Qianlong-Jiaqing period.It draws our attentions that many classical works were still influential in the study of history,non-Confucian classics,and literature in late Qing and early Republic of China.Xia Zeng-you and Liu Shi-pei are the main scholars who put“the New History”into practice;even though there are many differences in their views of history and origins of Classics.Their history textbooks especially embody the deep influences of classical tradition,and reflect the complex relations between Classical Studies and History in the last years of Qing Dynasty.

关 键 词：经学传统 夏曾佑 刘师培 史书编纂 

分 类 号：K825.4[历史地理—历史学] B222[哲学宗教—中国哲学]