教学型岗位设置为哪般——兼与王玲博士商榷  

The Purpose of Setting up the Post of Teaching-focused Faculty——A Discussion with Dr.Wang Ling

作　　者：杨会燕[1,2] YANG Huiyan

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学教科院,湖北武汉430074 [2]武汉体育学院研究生院,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《高教发展与评估》2021年第3期36-45,I0003,I0004,共12页Higher Education Development and Evaluation

基　　金：武汉体育学院2018年校级教学研究项目(201847)。

摘　　要：随着世界各地的教学型教师人数不断增长,王玲博士在《对大学教师分类设岗制度的质疑》一文中提出“教学、科研没有实质性冲突,设置教学岗位无助于教学质量提升”等观点。目前学界对教学型岗位设置认识存在分歧,影响了教学型教师的履职效果和持续发展。教学型岗位设置符合高等教育发展的相关规律,符合利益相关者的需求。教学型岗位角色定位不同于传统意义上的“教书匠”,而是视教学为创造性、专业性的学术活动。当前教学型岗位设置尚未达到预期目的,应从转变传统学术观、教学观,深化评价制度改革等方面入手不断改进,而不是简单否定分类管理的方向和趋势。Dr.Wang Ling put forward the viewpoint that"there is no substantive conflict between teaching and research,and setting up the post of teaching focused faculty(TFF)is not helpful to improve the quality of teaching"in the article"Questioning the system of setting up posts by category for university teachers".At present,the academic circles have different understandings on the setting of TFF posts,which affects the effectiveness and sustainable development of TFF.The setting of TF posts conforms to the relevant laws of the development of higher education and meets the needs of stakeholders.The role positioning of TFF posts is different from the traditional"teacher",but regards teaching as a creative and professional academic activity.The current TFF position setting has not yet achieved the expected purpose,and continuous improvement should be started from the transformation of traditional academic and teaching concepts,and deepening the reform of the evaluation system,rather than simply denying the direction and trend of classified management.

关 键 词：教学型岗位 高校教师 教学质量 教学学术 

分 类 号：G645[文化科学—高等教育学]