中美中学物理教材对比与分析——以“液体压强”为例  

COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF CHINESE AND U.S.MIDDLE SCHOOL PHYSICS TEXTBOOKS-A CASE STUDY ON“PRESSURE IN LIQUID”

作　　者：何敏 聂颖 肖化[1] 包雷[3] HE Min;NIE Ying;XIAO Hua;BAO Lei(School of Physics and Telecommunications Engineering,South China Normal University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510006;Suzhou Teacher Development Centre,Suzhou,Jiangsu 215600;Department of Physics,The Ohio State University,Columbus,USA 43210)

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学物理与电信工程学院,广东广州510006 [2]江苏省张家港市教师发展中心,江苏苏州215600 [3]美国俄亥俄州立大学物理学院,哥伦布俄亥俄州43210

出　　处：《物理与工程》2021年第2期46-53,共8页Physics and Engineering

基　　金：华南师范大学拔尖研究生留学基金;2018年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目《基于学习进阶的小学STEM课程分层整合模式研究》(项目编号:18YJA880096);美国国家自然基金项目(NSF DUE-1712238)。

摘　　要：液体压强是中学物理重要的知识点。为更有效地进行知识整合教育,帮助学生获得深度概念理解,本文以美国物理教材《物理:原理与应用》(第六版)和国内人教版初中物理教材为例,对两版教材中液体压强这一章节的知识点编排、学习顺序等方面进行比较,分析中考题目并对学生和初中物理教师进行访谈和问卷调查。本文通过对比两版教材各自的优势及差异,以及对学生问卷和访谈结果的分析,对我国物理教材编写提出几点建议。Pressure in liquid is an important topic in middle school physics. In order to carry out the knowledge integration education more effectively and help students acquire deep conceptual understanding in learning, this study compares the U.S. physics textbook "Physics: Principles and Applications"(6 th edition) with the Chinese junior high school physics textbook(the People’s Education Press) on the topic of "pressure in liquid" regarding the content arrangement, instruction process, and education emphasis. In addition, example questions in the middle school certification examination are analyzed to shed light on possible issues in the curriculum design. Survey questionnaire is also designed and administered along with supporting interviews conducted to further study students’ conceptual understanding on the related topics. Through comparisons of the textbooks of the two countries and analysis of the students’ and teachers’ responses to the questionnaire and interviews, this paper proposes several suggestions for further improvement of the Chinese physics textbook compilation.

关 键 词：中美物理教材 比较研究 液体压强 知识整合 深度学习 

分 类 号：G633.7[文化科学—教育学]