教育权力的法理基础  

Jurisprudential Basis of Educational Power

作　　者：于浩 郑晓军 Yu Hao;Zheng Xiaojun(School of Law,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China;School of Law,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学法学院,上海200241 [2]清华大学法学院,北京100084

出　　处：《华东师范大学学报（教育科学版）》2021年第8期107-115,共9页Journal of East China Normal University:Educational Sciences

基　　金：2021年度上海市教育法学人才培养计划项目“教育权力的法理基础”(2020JYFXR037)。

摘　　要：宪法受教育权利与义务的复合结构存在局限之处,权利与义务存在对应性的命题并不完全有效。教育权力的不恰当设定与行使,具有侵害受教育权利的可能性。在权力分化的背景下,可以将教育权力区分为公权力与私权力两种形态。梳理不同类型教育权力设定与行使的逻辑,有助于更系统、科学地划定不同规范体系中受教育权利的保障范围。公私领域界分的理念贯彻到教育法律关系中,意味着对于不同属性的教育权力,配置与之侵害风险相称的保障与控制机制是更为妥当的规范立场。There are some limitations in the compound structure of the right and obligation to receive education in the constitution,such as the proposition that the right and obligation are corresponding is not completely valid.The improper establishment and implementation of educational power may infringe upon the right to education.In the context of power differentiation,education power can be divided into public power and private power.Sorting out the logic of the establishment and implementation of different types of educational power may help us to define the protection scope of the right to education in different normative systems more systematically and scientifically.It is essential to use the concept of the division between the public and private spheres to treat the educational power,and allocate the protection and control mechanism commensurate with the risk of infringement on the right to education.

关 键 词：受教育权利 受教育义务 教育权力 家庭教育 国家教育 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] G40[政治法律—法学]