检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:文彦茹 王军利 Wen Yanru;Wang Junli(Faculty of Education,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin,541004)
出 处:《幼儿教育》2021年第30期19-24,共6页Early Childhood Education
基 金:全国教育科学规划国家青年项目“幼儿在六种基本情绪情境中情绪表达规则认知发展的追踪研究”(项目批准号:CHA150177);广西研究生教育创新计划厅级项目“情绪主题绘本促进少数民族地区幼儿情绪能力发展的行动研究”(项目批准号:YCSW2021107)的研究成果之一。
摘 要:本研究选取124名大班幼儿,考察人际关系背景和幼儿类型等因素对大班幼儿在6种基本情绪情境中的情绪表达规则认知的影响。结果表明:(1)城乡幼儿情绪表达规则的知识和目标得分差异均不显著,但在策略得分方面,城区幼儿的夸大策略得分显著高于乡镇幼儿,掩饰策略得分显著低于乡镇幼儿;(2)好朋友在场时幼儿的情绪表达规则知识得分显著高于父母在场时的得分;(3)在伤心情境中,父母在场时幼儿的社会定向目标得分显著低于好朋友在场时的得分,自我定向目标得分显著高于好朋友在场时的得分,而在生气情境中,父母在场时幼儿的社会定向目标得分显著高于好朋友在场时的得分;(4)幼儿在伤心情境中的情绪表达规则知识得分最高,在害怕情境中多使用掩饰策略,在高兴情境中多使用弱化策略。In this study,124 children from 6 year old classes were selected to examine the effects of interpersonal background and types of children on the cognitive development of children's emotional expression rules in six basic emotional situations.The results show that:(1)there was no significant difference between urban and rural children in knowledge and goal scores of emotional expression,but urban children scored higher in exaggeration strategy than rural children,and the opposite was true in masking strategy;(2)when good friends are present,children's knowledge score is significantly higher than that when parents are present;(3)in sad situation,children^scores of social orientation goals when parents were present were significantly lower than those when good friends were present,while in angry situation,they were on the contrary;(4)children in the sad situation scored the highest,and consider more about others,while in fear situation they use concealment strategy more,and use more weakening strategy in happy situation.
分 类 号:G610[文化科学—学前教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200