检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁征[1] 杨玉龙 YUAN Zheng;YANG Yulong(School of Education,South China Normal University,Guangzhou,Guangdong,China,510631)
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学教育科学学院,广东广州510631
出 处:《教育文化论坛》2021年第6期9-17,共9页Tribune of Education Culture
摘 要:1917年初,陈独秀应邀到北京大学担任文科学长,襄助改革。以往对陈独秀在北大改革教育的研究较为笼统,既未留意到陈独秀在学长任上的主要工作及其繁复程度,也忽视了改革过程中的观念冲突与现实阻力。面对已然固化的陈独秀的教育家形象,从学理上研究和探讨其教育思想与活动显得十分必要。事实上,陈独秀拟借文科学长职权在校内推行文学革命,然受限于文学观念冲突、师资质量差异及学术基础薄弱等主客观因素,陈独秀既无法主导文科学门改革方向,又缺乏可靠师资落实改革方案,可以说他在北京大学教育革新过程中劳而少功。In early 1917,Chen Duxiu was invited to serve as the director of liberal arts at Peking University to help reform.The previous research on Chen Duxiu’s education reform in Peking University was relatively general,neither noticing Chen Duxiu’s main work and its complexity in his presidency as a director,nor ignoring the conflict of ideas and practical resistance in the reform process.Facing the already solidified image of Chen Duxiu as an educator,it is necessary to study and discuss his educational thoughts and activities academically.In fact,Chen Duxiu relied on the power of director of liberal arts to promote the literary revolution in the university.However,due to subjective and objective factors such as conflicts of literary concepts,differences in the quality of teachers,and weak academic foundations,Chen Duxiu was unable to dominant the reform of liberal arts,nor could he provide reliable teachers for improving the education situation.It can be said that Chen Duxiu has few achievements in the process of educational innovation at Peking University.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.202.40