“人为自然立法”何以可能?——求知欲视角下的新阐释  

Why is it Possible for“Human Lawgiving of Nature”:a New Interpretation from the Perspective of Desire for Knowledge

作　　者：刘清平 LIU Qingping(School of Film and Television,Wuhan University of Communication,Wuhan,Hubei,China,430205)

机构地区：[1]武汉传媒学院电影与电视学院,湖北武汉430205

出　　处：《贵州大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第2期1-12,共12页Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)

摘　　要：康德的"人为自然立法"理念深刻触及了人如何认知事实真相的问题,但同时又由于忽视了求知欲指向确定性的内在诉求,包含着将这种立法仅仅归结为随机偶然的现象以及主张物自体不可知而陷入了逻辑自败的严重漏洞。实际上,一方面,认知能力有限的人们只有把求知欲指向确定性的诉求以必然性的方式加到事实上,才有可能理解对象的本来面目。另一方面,这种人为的立法既不会迫使对象符合认知结构,也不会扭曲对象的真相,而仅仅是帮助人们形成符合事实的确定性认知。所以,只有揭示了康德理念的深度悖论,我们才能澄清人们是怎样通过为自然立法的途径正确认知物自体的内在机制。Kant’s idea of“human lawgiving of nature”deeply touches on the problem of how people recognize the truth and fact.Due to ignoring the internal appeal of desire for knowledge to point to certainty,however,this idea contains some theoretic loopholes such as attributing this lawgiving to random chance and believing in logic self-defeat that the thing itself is always unknowable.In fact,on the one hand,people with limited cognitive ability can only reveal the truth of the object by adding to the fact the appeal of desire for knowledge to point to certainty,in the way of necessity.On the other hand,human lawgiving neither makes the object conform to the cognitive structure,nor distorts the truth of the object;it only helps people form the certain cognition of the facts.Therefore,only by revealing the deep paradox of Kant’s idea,can we clarify the internal mechanism of how people correctly know the thing itself through the way of lawgiving of nature.

关 键 词：康德 人为自然立法 物自体 求知欲 确定性 

分 类 号：B516.31[哲学宗教—外国哲学]