检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王滔[1] 邱岚茜 王连敏[1] 苏琨[1] 胡晟 吴涛[1] WANG Tao;QIU Lanxi;WANG Lianmin;SU Kun;HU Sheng;WU Tao(The Fourth Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery,The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming Yunnan 650101;Dept,of Minimally-Invasive Interventional Therapy,Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Yunnan Provincial Tumor Hospital Kunming Yunnan 650118;The Second Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery,The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming Yunnan 650101,China)
机构地区:[1]昆明医科大学第二附属医院肝胆胰外科四病区,云南昆明650101 [2]昆明医科大学第三附属医院微创介入科,云南昆明650118 [3]昆明医科大学第二附属医院肝胆胰外科二病区,云南昆明650101
出 处:《昆明医科大学学报》2022年第3期148-153,共6页Journal of Kunming Medical University
基 金:遗传资源与进化国家重点实验室开放课题(GREKF21-11);云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目(2022Y209);昆明医科大学教研教改课题(2020JY-Y-113)。
摘 要:目的评价基于PBL教学法对临床医学专业外科实习生评判性思维能力的影响,以提高临床专业本科生评判性思维能力。方法将2020年3月至12月参加肝胆胰外科四病区实习的大四临床医学专业本科实习生190名纳入本研究,随机法分成对照组和实验祖,实验组接纳PBL讲习方式,对照组则接纳传统讲习方式。利用评判性思维能力问卷评价2组实习生干预前后评判性思维能力的变化。结果干预后实验组评判性思维得分总分高于对照组(P<0.001),实验组在分析能力、评判性思维自信心、求知欲和认知成熟度4个维度均优于对照组(P<0.05);干预后实验组外科操作成绩为(91.04±3.51)分,高于对照组(85.72±3.94)分(P<0.05);干预后实验组学生对课程满意度的各项量化指标均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论PBL教学方式可显著提高临床专业普外科实习生评判性思维能力。Objective To evaluate the effect of PBL teaching method on the critical thinking ability of surgical interns majoring in clinical medicine,so as to improve the critical thinking ability of undergraduates majoring in clinical medicine.Methods A total of 190 clinical medicine undergraduate interns who participated in the laboratory practice from March to December 2020 were included in this study.They were randomly divided into control group and experiment pilot.The experimental group received PBL teaching mode,while the control group received traditional teaching mode.Critical thinking ability questionnaire was used to evaluate the change of critical thinking ability before and after intervention.Results After intervention,the total score of critical thinking in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group(P<0.001),and the experimental group was better than the control group in the four dimensions of analytical ability,critical thinking confidence,curiosity and cognitive maturity(P<0.05).After intervention,the surgical operation score of experimental group(91.04±3.51)was significantly higher than that of control group(85.72±3.94)(P<0.05).After intervention,the quantitative indexes of course satisfaction of the experimental group were significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion PBL teaching method can significantly improve the critical thinking ability of clinical general surgery interns.
分 类 号:G424.1[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117