文明比较与中华思想的逻辑特性  

Civilization Comparison and the Logic Feature of Chinese Thoughts

作　　者：李红岩[1,2] LI Hong-yan(Institute for Advanced Hermeneutics,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学阐释学高等研究院 [2]中国社会科学杂志社

出　　处：《文化软实力》2022年第1期5-18,F0002,共15页Cultural Soft Power

摘　　要：中西文明比较研究应以文明交流互鉴为原则。统一性是进行跨文化、跨民族、跨区域观察与研究的首要前提与基础。中西古典阐释学比较研究,是中西文明比较研究的新领域。中西双方思维形式不同,各有所长。荀子在中国古代知识领域发挥的作用,与亚里士多德在西方发挥的作用相当。中华思想始终保持了发达的辩证逻辑形式,天道是中国哲学的第一命题。中华逻辑范畴依照“言—象—意”的结构运转,形成了包含本体母题、范畴谱系、论证方式在内的完整体系。The comparative study of Chinese and Western civilizations should be based on the principle of communicating and learning from each other.Unity is the premise and basis of cross-culture,cross-nation and cross-region observations and researches.The comparative study of classic Chinese and Western hermeneutics is a new field of comparative studies between Chinese and Western civilizations.Both Chinese and Western ways of thoughts make their unique contribution.The significance of Xunzi in ancient Chinese knowledge field is as excellent as Aristotle in the West.Chinese thought kept its developed dialectical logic form.Tao is the first proposition of Chinese philosophy.Chinese logic category moves as the structure of“language-presentation-connotation”,forming a complete system including ontological motif,category genealogy and demonstration.

关 键 词：中西文明比较 中华优秀传统文化 统一性 特殊性 阐释学 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]