检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄金凤 张建喜 于江涛 苗术佶 HUANG Jinfeng;ZHANG Jianxi;YU Jiangtao;MIAO Shuji(College of Mechanical Engineering,North China University of Science and Technology,Tangshan 063210,China;Hebei Industrial Robot Industry Technology Research Institute,Tangshan 063000,China;Tangshan Yintai Intelligent Technology Development Co.,Ltd.,Tangshan 063000,China)
机构地区:[1]华北理工大学机械工程学院,河北唐山063210 [2]河北省工业机器人产业技术研究院,河北唐山063000 [3]唐山因泰智能科技发展有限公司,河北唐山063000
出 处:《工矿自动化》2022年第8期26-32,42,共8页Journal Of Mine Automation
基 金:河北省创新能力提升计划项目(199676195H)。
摘 要:目前煤矸石分选机械手多采用串联式,与串联机械手相比,并联机械手能够在短时间内达到较高的运动速度,且负载能力更强,更适用于大质量煤矸石分选。以并联式选矸机器人为研究对象,对其并联机械手的“梯”型路径规划与“V”型路径规划2种动态分选路径规划方法进行对比分析。“梯”型路径规划:机械手末端执行器将矸石推出输送带后,先向上抬起一定距离,再完成回程运动。“V”型路径规划:机械手末端执行器将矸石推出输送带后,先回到标准线内,再快速运动到与下一个目标矸石平行的位置,完成1个运动周期。通过建立并联机械手动力学模型,探究机械手在沿2种路径运动时驱动电动机转矩的变化情况,计算在转矩满足要求的前提下,沿2种路径完成1个运动周期所用的时间,进而对比机械手沿2种路径的作业效率。仿真结果表明,采用“梯”型路径和“V”型路径完成1个运动周期所用时间分别为1.2,0.65 s,采用“V”型路径所用时间较短,选矸效率较高。现场应用结果表明,采用“V”型路径、“梯”型路径时,平均矸石分选率分别为94.23%和88.28%,且采用“V”型路径时的总用时比采用“梯”型路径时少近19%,选矸效率更高。At present,the coal gangue selection manipulator is mostly used in series.Compared with the series manipulator,the parallel manipulator can achieve higher movement speed in a short time,and the load capacity is stronger.Therefore,it is more suitable for the selection of heavy coal gangue.Taking the parallel gangue selection robot as the research object,the two dynamic sorting path planning methods of"ladder"path planning and"V"path planning of parallel manipulator are compared and analyzed."Ladder"path planning:after the end effector of the manipulator pushes the gangue out of the conveyor belt,it first lifts up a certain distance,and then completes the return movement."V"path planning:after the end effector of the manipulator pushes the gangue out of the conveyor belt,it first returns to the standard line,and then quickly moves to the position parallel to the next target gangue,completing one movement cycle.By establishing the mechanical model of the parallel manipulator,the torque variation of the drive motor is explored when the manipulator moved along the two paths.The time for completing a movement cycle along the two paths is calculated on the premise that the torque met the requirements.And the working efficiency of the manipulator along the two paths is compared.The simulation results show that the time taken to complete a movement cycle along"ladder"path and"V"path is 1.2,0.65 s respectively.The"V"path takes a shorter time and has a higher gangue selection efficiency.The site application results show that the average gangue selection rate is 94.23%and 88.28%respectively when the"V"path and the"ladder"path are adopted.The total time of the"V"path is nearly 19%less than that of the"ladder"path,and the gangue selection efficiency is higher.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7