工学之外--民国建筑教育研究的补充与完善  

Beyond Engineering Complementation and Optimization of Architectural Education from 1912 to 1949

作　　者：张骐跃 单踊[1] ZHANG Qiyue;SHAN Yong

机构地区：[1]东南大学建筑学院,南京210096

出　　处：《建筑学报》2022年第7期107-112,共6页Architectural Journal

摘　　要：作为我国建筑学教育的开端,民国时期的建筑学在政策上被列于工学之下,明确了我国工学建筑的正统地位,而以传统工匠体系为基础的职业建筑学教育由于不属于高等教育范畴而被排除在视野之外,成为民国建筑教育版图的缺失。随着艺术类院校在1930年代前后加入建筑办学的行列,产生了将学校的办学性质等同于教学性质的误判。旨在明确职业建筑教育的存在与价值,完善民国建筑教育版图,以教学性质为线索,通过可视化的图像表达还原这一时期建筑学教育的多样性。At the beginning of Chinese architectural education,architecture was listed under engineering,which clarified the leading position of engineering architecture form 1912 to 1949.However,professional education arising from traditional craftsman system was excluded from this discourse as it did not belong to the tertiary education,which marks a negligence of republican architectural education.As art schools joined the ranks of architecture education around the 1930s,a misjudgment which regards school types to teaching types appeared.This paper clarifies the existence and value of professional architectural education to complement the full map of architectural education in this period of time,and restores the diversity of architectural education in this period through visual expression hinged on the nature of teaching.

关 键 词：建筑学教育 工学院 美术学院 职业教育 北京高等师范学校 

分 类 号：G642[文化科学—高等教育学] TU-4[文化科学—教育学]