检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙红梅 孙小越 郝雨 SUN Hongmei;SUN Xiaoyue;HAO Yu(School of Management,Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 301617)
出 处:《心理与行为研究》2022年第5期615-621,共7页Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基 金:天津市教委科研计划项目(2018SK004)。
摘 要:为探讨挫折情境下自我肯定对执行功能的影响,创设挫折和非挫折情境,采用价值观自我肯定干预,通过Stroop范式和2-back范式分别测量抑制控制和工作记忆的刷新能力。结果发现,挫折情境下的Stroop任务和2-back任务反应时均高于非挫折情境;挫折情境下自我肯定组在Stroop任务和2-back任务上的反应时均显著低于非自我肯定组,而非挫折情境下两组的反应时没有显著性差异;Stroop效应量在情境与肯定条件上的交互作用不显著。结果表明挫折降低了执行功能的任务表现,自我肯定干预能够改善挫折情境下执行功能相关的任务成绩,促进了个体对工作记忆任务的刷新能力和Stroop任务的认知表现,但对抑制控制能力的改善没有明显作用。The current study aimed to assess the performance on executive functioning tasks following value affirmation in frustrating situations. The tasks measured core executive functioning aspects, that is, inhibition(assessed by a Stroop word-color naming task)and working memory(assessed by a 2-back task). The results revealed that: frustrated participants reacted slower in the Stroop task and 2-back task than non-frustrated participants. The self-affirmed participants in a frustrating situation reacted faster than nonaffirmed participants. However, there was no significant difference between the response time of self-affirmed and non-affirmed participants in non-frustrating situation. The interaction between context and affirmative conditions was not significant in Stroop task. These findings suggest that the induced frustration can reduce aspects of performance on executive functioning and the selfaffirming may improve performance on tasks related to executive functioning in frustrating situations which then improves updating of working memory and the achievement in Stroop task. However, self-affirmation does not improve inhibitory control.
关 键 词:自我肯定 执行功能 STROOP任务 2-back任务 挫折
分 类 号:B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.23.205