道问学与尊德性折衷于孔子之道--论孙奇逢解决朱陆五百年聚讼的理路  

Pursuing Virtue and Seeking for Knowledge Finally Adjusted to Confucius’Way--On Sun Qifeng’s Theoretical Approach to Solve the Debate of Zhu and Lu Which Continued More Than 500 Years

作　　者：程志华[1] 王珏[1] CHENG Zhi-hua;WANG Jue(School of Philosophy and Sociology,Hebei University,Baoding 071002,China)

机构地区：[1]河北大学哲学与社会学学院,河北保定071002

出　　处：《河北学刊》2022年第6期16-27,共12页Hebei Academic Journal

基　　金：2020年度国家社会科学基金重点项目“王船山哲学研究”(20FZXA004)。

摘　　要：自从“鹅湖之辩”后,“道问学”与“尊德性”之争便一直延续下来。对于这长达五百年之“聚讼”,孙奇逢解决的理路是,既承认二者之别,又阐释二者之同,最终超越出“门户”之争,将二者“折衷”于“孔子之道”。“孔子之道”虽为“本于天”的“天理”,但它不离人伦日用,故“体贴天理”只需“操功于日用食息间”。实际上,这种解决“门户”聚讼的理路可具有普适意义。From the“E-hu Academic Debate”,the contest between“Seeking for Knowledge”and“Pursuing Virtue”continued for a long time.To solve this debate,Sun Qifeng’s theoretical approach is,admitted the difference between them,as well as explained the similarities of them,surmounted the contest of“School”,and finally adjusted both of them to“Confucius’Way”.The“Confucius’Way”was the“Heavenly Principle”,but it can’t leave without ethical personality and daily life.So,if wanting to“obtain the Heavenly Principle”,you only need to“be diligent through daily life”.In fact,this theoretical approach to solve the contest of“School”has universal significance.

关 键 词：孙奇逢 道问学 尊德性 折衷 孔子之道 

分 类 号：B21[哲学宗教—中国哲学]