扎根理论的运用:误区与策略  

Application of Grounded Theory:Misconceptions and Strategies

作　　者：何木叶[1] 刘电芝[1] He Muye;Liu Dianzhi(School of Education,Soochow University,Suzhou,215123)

机构地区：[1]苏州大学教育学院,苏州215123

出　　处：《心理科学》2022年第5期1273-1279,共7页Journal of Psychological Science

摘　　要：扎根理论近年来在心理学研究中呈上升趋势。然而,其核心原则的应用存在如下误区:忽视理论生成;混淆不同类型的抽样或饱和概念;重机械编码轻备忘录写作和持续比较。在回顾已有文献的基础上,本研究归纳了理论抽样、理论饱和、合理编码、备忘录撰写、持续比较和本土化心理学理论建构的具体策略。未来研究应重视扎根理论核心原则运用的系统性、规范性、灵活性,并结合研究实际创造性地将原则具体化为策略。In recent years, the application of grounded theory in psychology is on the rise, but the misconceptions in its application constrain the quality of research. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide a reference for practical studies through the clarification of common misconceptions in the application of grounded theory and proposals of specific strategies for the difficulties in its use.On the ground of literature analysis, this article dissects the misconceptions about using grounded theory in psychology. The misconceptions discussed here are as follows. Misconception 1: some studies of grounded theory neglect theory generation. The grounded theory method holds the advantage of producing and promoting new theories. The development of localization theory is one of the important paths for the advances of psychology in China, so the application of grounded theory should focus on theoretical pursuits. Misconception 2: many researchers confuse theoretical sampling with purposive or initial sampling. Equating purposive sampling with theoretical sampling confuses the concept of distinct categories.It ignores the uniqueness of the theoretical focus of theoretical sampling, which means they cannot be used as synonymous terms. Theoretical sampling proceeds based on data analysis, but the initial sampling collects initial information. They are not the equivalents. Misconception 3: some researchers equate theoretical saturation with data saturation. There are differences between data saturation and theoretical saturation in purpose,meaning, occurrence stage, and manifestations. On this ground, it cannot be equated with data saturation. Misconception 4: some researchers often downplay memo writing and constant comparison but exaggerate mechanical coding. The mechanical coding disengages from the actual conditions of researching. Memo-writing and constant comparison promote category generation and theory development. It needs to increase attention on flexible coding, memo writing, and constant comparison.Targetin

关 键 词：扎根理论 核心原则 误区 运用策略 

分 类 号：B84-0[哲学宗教—基础心理学]