检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:匡钊 Kuang Zhao
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院大学哲学院 [2]中国社会科学院哲学研究所,北京100732
出 处:《中州学刊》2023年第1期118-124,共7页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou
摘 要:《庄子·齐物论》代表了典型的庄子面对事物与知识的世界的态度,亦提供了何以可能达成超越庸常的所谓逍遥境界的基本说明。由道家的一贯立场而言,后者意味着某种得道的方式,而对于庄子而言,则其展现为对自我问题的发现、对其转化问题的关注与对特定超越性视角的确证。如所周知,庄子言说上述内容的方式具有鲜明的自身特色,即以隐喻作为哲学修辞的基本手段,表达自己对于自我和道的关系的新理解。通过重新聚焦《齐物论》中贯穿性的“吾丧我”问题,评估相关的重要结构隐喻,如“三赖”“環中”“物化”等,可见庄子如何由道—物关系出发证成自己对于道—我问题的理解,以及他对自我转化过程的理解,而在理解这些问题的时候,隐喻作为哲学修辞的手段可被作为现有语文学研究的有益补充。The equality of all things in Zhuang Zi represents a typical Zhuang Zi’s attitude towards the world of things and knowledge,and also provides a basic explanation of how it is possible to achieve the so-called escape beyond the ordinary.From the consist⁃ent Taoist standpoint,this implies some way of attaining the Dao,while for Zhuang Zi it manifests itself as the discovery of the self,the concern for the self-transformation,and the confirmation of a specific transcendent perspective.As we all know,Zhuang Zi’s way of saying about these issues has a distinct characteristic,that is,using metaphor as the basic means of philosophical rhetoric to express his new understanding of the relationship between self and Dao.By refocusing on the permeating“I lose myself”statement in The equality of all things,and evaluating the related important structural metaphors,such as“Sanlai”,“Huanzhong”,and“transformation of things”,we can see how Zhuang Zi started from the Tao-object relationship to prove his own understanding of the Tao-I problem,as well as his understanding of the self-transformation process.In understanding these,metaphor as a means of philosophical rhetoric can be used as a powerful supplement to the present philological research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104