检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李鹏举[1] 张献华 江玉印[1] LI Peng-ju;ZHANG Xian-hua;JIANG Yu-yin(Shannxi Xueqian Normal University,Xi’an 710100,China;Shandong Women’s University,Jinan 250300,China)
机构地区:[1]陕西学前师范学院,陕西西安710100 [2]山东女子学院,山东济南250300
出 处:《山东女子学院学报》2023年第1期112-117,共6页Journal of Shandong Women's University
基 金:陕西省教育厅重点科学研究计划——哲学社会科学重点研究基地项目“幼儿园男教师职业生活质量和专业发展策略研究”(项目编号:20JZ032);西安市哲学社会科学基金项目“幼儿园文化建设的绩效评价研究”(项目编号:JY134);陕西省教育科学规划课题“幼儿园文化建设评价指标体系构建与实证研究”(项目编号:SGH21Y0162)。
摘 要:既有文献显示,“幼儿园男教师重要但匮乏”已经成为当前相关研究的主流话语,但却鲜有研究关注到该话语的生成路径,因此,有必要从话语路径的视角重新对幼儿园男教师的相关研究进行梳理、解构和反思,以揭示被话语遮蔽的权力运作。研究发现:第一,对幼儿园男教师性别职业优势的研究经历了从“经验化”到“概念化”的转变,但却普遍缺乏实证支持;第二,已有研究在男教师性别职业优势的逻辑上,进一步将幼儿园教师女多男少的“现状”塑造成教师队伍男女性别结构失衡的“问题”;第三,该话语生成涉及多方的利益诉求,并在各方权力博弈的过程中,制造了现实图景中幼儿园教师男女性别不平等的问题。基于对以上话语路径的解构,有必要对幼儿园男教师的研究逻辑进行系统性反思与总结,以期在更高水平上凝聚新的共识。Existing literature shows that“male kindergarten teachers are important but in great demand”has become the mainstream discourse in current research,but no research has paid attention to the generation process of such discourse.Therefore,it is necessary to sort the related research,deconstruct and reflect on it,so as to reveal the power operation behind it from the perspective of discourse path.The findings are as follows:first,the research on the gender occupational advantages of male kindergarten teachers has undergone a transition from“empirical”to“conceptual”,but there is generally no empirical support;Second,based on the logic of male teachers’gender professional advantages,existing studies have further shaped the“current situation”of more female than male kindergarten teachers into a“problem”of imbalance in gender structure of the teaching staff;Third,the formation of this discourse involves the interest demands of many parties,and in the process of power game of all parties,it“creates”the problem of gender inequality among kindergarten teachers in the realistic picture.Based on the deconstruction of the above discourse paths,it is necessary to make a systematic reflection and summary of the research logic of male kindergarten teachers,in hope of a new consensus at a higher level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15