共同犯罪案件的分案审理研究  

Research on Division of Joint Crime Cases

作　　者：杨杰辉[1] Yang Jiehui

机构地区：[1]浙江工业大学法学院,杭州310023

出　　处：《复印报刊资料（诉讼法学、司法制度）》2022年第6期85-97,共13页

基　　金：2020年度国家社会科学基金一般项目“刑事一体化视域下一事不再理的效力范围研究”(20BFX092)。

摘　　要：共同犯罪案件的特征以及实现刑事诉讼价值的目标决定了共同犯罪案件原则上应该并案审理。分案审理只有在两种情形下才可以采用:一种是被告人人数众多、案情复杂,并案审理无法保障庭审质量和效率的;另一种是为保护被告人的利益而有必要分案审理的。分案审理,应该设立科学合理的决定程序:赋予法院分案审理的审查决定权,赋予被告人对分案审理决定的参与权、救济权,明确分案审理违法的程序性后果等。分案审理后,应该保障被告人的对质权,尤其应该赋予被告人对共犯的完整对质权。妥善处理前案裁判与后案裁判的关系,明确前案裁判对后案裁判没有预决效力,最多只具有参考价值。The characteristics of joint crime cases and the realization of the value of criminalproceedings determine that in principle,joint criminal cases should be tried together.Division of cases can only be used in two cases:one is the number of defendants,the complexity of the case,the quality and efficiency of the trial can not be guaranteed;The other is to protect the interests of the defendant and the need to separate trials.The decision procedure of divisional trial should be established,including giving the court the right to review,giving the defendant the right of participation,right of relief and making clear the procedural consequences of illegal division trial.After divisional trial,the right to pledge should be guaranteed to the defendant,especially to the accomplice.We should properly deal with the relationship between the former case judgment and the latter case judgment.The previous case judgment has no pre-decision effect on the later case judgment.

关 键 词：共同犯罪 分案审理 并案审理 对质权 裁判效力 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]