检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘娜[1] LIU Na(Department of Otolaryngology,Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University,Liaoning Province,Shenyang 110000,China)
机构地区:[1]中国医科大学附属盛京医院耳鼻喉鼻科,辽宁沈阳110000
出 处:《中国中医药现代远程教育》2023年第7期50-52,共3页Chinese Medicine Modern Distance Education of China
摘 要:目的评估在耳鼻喉科教育中,引入教学(Didactics)、指定(Designate)、分发(Distribute)、设计(Design)、交付(Delivery)和讨论(Discuss)的6D学习方法的教学效果。方法选取2019年9月—2020年9月中国医科大学60名临床医学专业学生作为研究对象,随机分为2组:6D学习方法组和传统学习方法组,每组30名。6D学习方法组采用6D学习法,传统学习方法组采用常规教学模式。比较2组学生的最终考试成绩和教学满意度。结果6D学习方法组的学生最终考试成绩以及教学满意度均高于传统学习方法,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用6D学习方法有助提高学生学习成绩,更能带动学生积极性及学习满意度,有应用价值。Objective To evaluate the teaching effect of introducing didactics,sharing,distributing,design,delivery and discussing 6D learning methods in otolaryngology education.Methods 60 clinical medicine students from September 2019 to September 2020 were selected as research objects and randomly divided into two groups:6D learning method group and traditional learning method group,with 30 students in each group.The 6D learning method group adopted 6D learning method,while the traditional learning method group adopted conventional teaching mode.The test scores,learning enthusiasm and satisfaction of the two groups of students were compared,and the differences were statistically significant.Results The final test scores and teaching satisfaction of students in the 6D learning method group were higher than those in the traditional teaching group.Conclusion TThe application of 6D learning method can help improve students’academic performance,and can promote students’enthusiasm and learning satisfaction,which has application value.
分 类 号:R-4[医药卫生] G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90