检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:阮永乐[1] 王志维[1] Ruan Yongle;Wang Zhiwei(Department of Cardiovascular Surgery,Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University/The First Clinical College of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430060,China)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学人民医院心血管外科/武汉大学第一临床学院,武汉430060
出 处:《中华医学教育探索杂志》2023年第1期128-132,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年基金(81501376);中国博士后科学基金(2017M620339);湖北省自然科学基金(2015CFB345)。
摘 要:通过对中美两国胸心外科住院医师培训体系的培训前教育背景、培训制度及培训后执业方向进行比较,发现美国胸心外科住院医师培训入学门槛高、培养周期长、教育支出高,但其管理专业化、专科特点突出、评价体系完善,适合培养胸心外科专科医学人才。而我国目前的胸心外科住院医师培训尚需进一步完善,需借鉴美国住院医师培训体系的优点,制定更为合理和专业化的胸心外科住院医师培养方案,为我国培养优秀胸心外科专业人才。Through the comparison of the residency training system between China and the United States in pre-training educational background,training policy and post-training career path,it is concluded that the cardiothoracic surgery residency training in the United States has a high admission threshold,long training cycle and high education cost,but it also has the advantages of professional management,outstanding specialty characteristics and perfect evaluation system,which are suitable for the training of cardiothoracic surgeons.However,the current residency training of cardiothoracic surgery in China needs to be further improved.Learning from the advantages of the United States residency training system,we can formulate a more reasonable and professional residency training program according to Chinese own characteristics,so as to train excellent cardiothoracic surgeons for our country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.221.185