《说文解字注》与《说文通训定声》比较分析  

A Comparison of Shuo Wen Jie Zi Zhu and Shuo Wen Tong Xun Ding Sheng

作　　者：李超[1] 郝继东[1] LI Chao;HAO Jidong(School of Literature,Shenyang Normal University,Shenyang Liaoning,110034,China)

机构地区：[1]沈阳师范大学文学院,辽宁沈阳110034

出　　处：《文化创新比较研究》2023年第6期52-56,共5页Comparative Study of Cultural Innovation

摘　　要：《说文解字注》和《说文通训定声》都是清代学者对传世本《说文解字》进行研究后写成的经典之作。通过比较可以发现二书虽皆重视音义之间的相互关系,但又各有侧重:前者更倾向于还原《说文解字》原貌,保留《说文解字》原有体系,更重视本义和本字,属于文字学著作;而后者则是打乱《说文解字》原有体系,建立自己的说解系统,属于语言学著作。Shuo Wen Jie Zi Zhu and Shuo Wen Tong Xun Ding Sheng are the classic works written by scholars in the Qing Dynasty after studying Shuo Wen Jie Zi.Through comparison,it can be found that although the two books attach importance to the relationship between sound and meaning,they have their own focuses:Shuo Wen Jie Zi Zhu tends to restore the original appearance of Shuo Wen Jie Zi,retain the original system of Shuo Wen Jie Zi,and pay more attention to the original meaning and the original word,which belongs to philology works.The latter is to disrupt the original system of Shuo Wen Jie Zi and establish its own interpretation system,which belongs to linguistic works.

关 键 词：《说文解字》 《说文解字注》 《说文通训定声》 比较 

分 类 号：H161[语言文字—汉语] H194.1