检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐昉[1] 李艳[2] XU Fang;LI Yan
机构地区:[1]南京大学外国语学院,江苏南京210023 [2]西北大学外国语学院,陕西西安710127
出 处:《解放军外国语学院学报》2023年第3期1-8,52,160,共10页Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages
摘 要:二语写作教师做出书面反馈的决策过程尚未得到充分重视。本研究采用质性个案研究方法,描述和解释西安某高校两位英语写作教师对一篇学生议论文进行书面反馈的决策过程。研究发现两者经历的思维阶段(即识别、评估、反馈)趋于相似,差异在于评估的视角不同,继而在反馈侧重的问题以及反馈的时间、形式与语用策略上的选择各不同;造成差异的主要因素是教学信念。研究表明,理解教师反馈的决策过程特征,对于写作教师的反馈素养发展具有重要意义。The decision⁃making process of teacher written feedback in second language(L2)writing has not yet received sufficient attention.Drawing on a qualitative case study approach,the present study describes and explains decision⁃making process features of written feedback to a student argumentative essay by two L2 writing teachers from a university in Xi'an.The study finds that both teachers go through similar phases of decision making(i.e.,discerning,evaluating,responding)but differ in their perspectives of evaluation,generating subsequent differences in feedback focus,as well as choices regarding timing,forms,and pragmatic strategies of the written feedback.It also finds that teaching beliefs tend to factor in these differences.The study demonstrates that understanding the decision⁃making process of teacher written feedback has important implications for the development of teacher feedback literacy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7