检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘玲 LIU Ling
机构地区:[1]暨南大学文学院
出 处:《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2023年第6期124-132,共9页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
摘 要:对审美经验的主要代表性理论的考察可以表明,美学中存在通过结合注意来说明审美经验的传统。然而,以往各种解释针对注意大多都给以一种“全神贯注”式的常识性理解,并没有对注意本身给以清晰的说明。新近认知科学哲学中“审美注意”研究的复兴试图专门为审美注意的特殊性进行解释和辩护。但通过细致考察,这些新进展面临着概念分析和经验说明的二难困境。关于审美注意问题的这些探讨生动具现了哲学与认知科学互动研究所面临的深描难题。The interactions between aesthetics and cognitive science have attracted more and more concern with the rise of neuro-aesthetics,and the philosophical discussions of attention itself in aesthetics has also received renewed debates.This paper focuses on the concept of“aesthetic attention”,which is discussed in both aesthetic and philosophy of cognitive science,analyzes the new theories,represented by the aesthetician Bence Nanay,that defend aesthetic attention as a sui generis type of attention,and examines their common problems and inspirations.This article has four main parts.The first part focuses on the debate about“disinterested attention”,pointing out that both for and against positions,in fact,analyze aesthetic experience through attention.However,these theories do not give attention itself a clear explication,only taking it as a“preoccupied”common sense understanding.The second part of the article focuses on the new ideas in the philosophy of cognitive science represented by the aesthetician Nanay.These ideas focus on the explication of attention itself and mainly reinterpret“aesthetic attention”in the form of focused attention and distributed attention,but these explanations still have their own problems:the simultaneous problem for Nanay's explanation,and the discrepancy with the actual experience for the other two theories.The third part further examines the dilemma faced by the above path of the philosophy of cognitive science as whole,illustrates that whether give the attention mechanism a general or unique explanation,these theories still need to rely on traditional aesthetic concepts,such as“disinterested”,which are highly controversial,and this makes the concept of“aesthetic attention”redundant,showing that the unique aesthetic attention is doubtful.The fourth part combines Ryle's distinction between thick/thin descriptions to highlight the positive contributions of the path of philosophy of cognitive science,and the difficulties faced by the interaction between philosophy a
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.167.222