护理硕士专业学位研究生教育质量评价框架的构建及权重分析  

Construction of education quality evaluation framework for master of nursing specialist and weight analysis

作　　者：赵荣 于文舟 王瑛[1] ZHAO Rong;YU Wenzhou;WANG Ying(Weifang Medical University,Shandong 261053 China)

机构地区：[1]潍坊医学院,山东261053 [2]青岛大学附属医院

出　　处：《护理研究》2023年第14期2494-2500,共7页Chinese Nursing Research

基　　金：山东省研究生教育质量提升计划项目,编号:SDYKC19159;学位与研究生教育研究课题,编号:2020MSA445。

摘　　要：目的:构建护理硕士专业学位(MNS)研究生教育质量评价框架并确定各指标权重。方法:以学生发展理论为研究框架,通过文献回顾、半结构化访谈、小组讨论及专家函询构建MNS研究生教育质量评价框架;运用层次分析法对MNS研究生教育质量评价框架进行指标权重分析。结果:2轮专家函询问卷有效回收率分别为92.31%和100.00%,专家个人权威系数为0.775~0.875,群体权威系数分别为0.817和0.825;专家函询肯德尔协调系数为0.244~0.369(均P<0.05)。最终形成的MNS研究生教育质量评价框架中,应届毕业生版包括3个一级指标、6个二级指标、18个三级指标;往届毕业生版包括4个一级指标、8个二级指标、25个三级指标。MNS研究生教育质量评价框架中应届毕业生版一级指标中相对权重最高的是“过程质量”(0.6080),其次为“输出质量”(0.2721),“输入质量”最低(0.1199)。结论:构建的MNS研究生教育质量评价框架具有科学性,其内容系统、全面,可为MNS研究生教育质量评价提供新思路。Objective:To construct education quality evaluation framework for master of nursing specialist(MNS)and determine the weight of each index.Methods:Theory of student development was used as research framework,and the education quality evaluation framework for MNS was constructed through literature review,semi⁃structured interviews,group discussions,and expert inquiries.Indicator weight of the education quality evaluation framework for MNS was analyzed by analytic hierarchy process.Results:The effective response rates of two rounds of expert inquiry questionnaires were 92.31%and 100.00%,respectively.The individual authority coefficients of experts were from 0.775 to 0.875,and the group authority coefficients were 0.817 and 0.825,respectively.The Kendall coordination coefficient were from 0.244 to 0.369(all P<0.05).The final education quality evaluation framework for MNS of new graduates included 3 first⁃level indicators,6 second-level indicators,and 18 third⁃level indicators,and the education quality evaluation framework for MNS of former graduates included 4 first⁃level indicators,8 second⁃level indicators,and 25 third-level indicators.In the education quality evaluation framework for MNS of new graduates,the highest relative weight among the first⁃level indicators was"process quality"(0.6080),followed by"output quality"(0.2721),and"input quality"was the lowest(0.1199).Conclusions:The constructed education quality evaluation framework for MNS is scientific.Its content is systematic and comprehensive.It can be providing new ideas for education quality evaluation of MNS.

关 键 词：护理硕士专业学位 护理教育 质量评价 学生发展理论 德尔菲法 护理 

分 类 号：R47-4[医药卫生—护理学] G643[医药卫生—临床医学]