《史记》《汉书》之董仲舒书写析较  

A Comparative Study of the Records of Dong Zhongshu in Records of the Grand Historian and Book of Han

作　　者：董金裕 DONG Jinyu(Department of Chinese Language and Literature,National Chengchi University,Taibei,Taiwan 11605,China;Hebei Centre for Studies of Dong Zhongshu and Traditional Culture,Hengshui,Hebei 053000,China)

机构地区：[1]台湾政治大学中文系,中国台湾台北11605 [2]河北省董仲舒与传统文化研究中心,河北衡水053000

出　　处：《衡水学院学报》2023年第5期11-15,共5页Journal of Hengshui University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目《董仲舒传世文献考辨与历代注疏研究》(19ZDA027);河北省教育厅人文社会科学重大课题攻关项目《董仲舒思想及其现实意义研究》(ZD202125)。

摘　　要：《史记》《汉书》皆记述董仲舒之生平及成就,《史记》将之置于《儒林列传》中,《汉书》则为之单独立传。《史记》所载稍简,共六项;《汉书》则颇详细,增减为八项,较诸《史记》,所增项目虽然有限,但篇幅则多达二十余倍。究其原因,一是《史记》《汉书》虽皆为正史,但两者由于所记起讫之年代,以及是否获得官方认可,在性质上有所不同;二是司马迁、班固两人对董仲舒之学的了解及影响程度不同。两人或导其源,或浚其流,皆对表彰董仲舒之学及其对儒学的贡献卓有功绩。Records of the Grand Historian and Book of Han both give an account of Dong Zhongshu’s life and achievements,which are recorded in“Biography of the Scholars”of Records of the Grand Historian,but are narrated in a biography of Book of Han.The former is brief,totaling six items while the latter is more detailed,adding to eight items.Compared with the former,the added items are limited,but the length is more than 20 times.The reasons are as follows:First,although both of them are official histories,they are different in nature because of the dates when they were recorded and whether they were officially recognized;Second,Sima Qian and Ban Gu have different understanding of and influence on Dong Zhongshu’s theories.Both of them,either by introducing their source or by exploring their development,have made great contributions to giving commendation to Dong Zhongshu’s theories as well as his contribution to Confucianism.

关 键 词：董仲舒 《史记》 《汉书》 班固 儒学 

分 类 号：B234.5[哲学宗教—中国哲学]