检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王金巴[1] WANG Jinba(Foreign Languages Department,Yuncheng University,Yuncheng 044000,China)
出 处:《运城学院学报》2023年第5期88-95,共8页Journal of Yuncheng University
基 金:山西省教育科学“十四五”规划2022年课题(GH-220026)。
摘 要:通过对某大学英语专业学术论文写作课上42名学生进行问卷调查和半结构式访谈.本研究旨在探讨:1)基于过程的学术论文写作教学中,学习者如何感知纠错反馈的重要性?2)学习者最期待的纠错反馈是什么?3)学习者喜欢以何种方式获得纠错反馈?4)学习者如何感知语法教学的重要性?研究结果表明:学习者认为纠错反馈对提高他们的写作很重要;他们希望在语法、词汇、拼写、组织、标点等方面得到全面的纠错反馈,其中语法反馈为首选;从基于结果到基于过程的方法转变,并没有明显改变学习者关注形式、忽视内容的现象.By conducting a questionnaire and a semi-constructed interview among 42 English majors who were taking academic writing course at a Shanxi University,the study aims to find out:1) How learners in the context of process-based academic writing perceived the importance of corrective feedbacks(CF) 2) What CF was expected the most? 3) In what way learners preferred to have their CF provided? 4) How learners perceived the importance of grammar teaching?The course itself was delivered in a process-based writing in which content development and rhetoric were given more emphasis than grammar accuracy was.The findings suggest that learners still considered CFs as important and useful for their writing improvement.Learners expected to have comprehensive CFs of grammar,vocabulary,spelling,organization and punctuation,and CF on grammar was the most preferred one.Finally,this study concludes that the shift of approach from a product-based to a process-based did not significantly change learners' focus from forms to content.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15