检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:盛宁 SHENG Ning
机构地区:[1]上海大学哲学系
出 处:《哲学分析》2023年第6期76-87,191,192,共14页Philosophical Analysis
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目“三教互动视域下的竺道生生活世界与思想建构研究”(项目编号:18CZX023)阶段性成果。
摘 要:近世儒学复兴运动之后,儒家对生死议题的探讨带有重新发现的意味,这既是对儒学内部主动回避这一问题的反弹,也是出于响应佛、道挑战以捍卫中华文化本根精神的价值自觉。在这个过程中,可区分出三个阶段,即关切—直面—超越。其中,关切阶段,从理学自身的建构脉络来看,主要以韩愈、李翱、周敦颐三人为代表。他们如何转变态度进行思考、响应生死议题的内在逻辑、更新传统儒学生死观,展示出在近世儒学复兴中,其应对佛教挑战过程中的角色意识转变。After the recent Confucian renaissance movement,the discussion of the issue of life and death by Confucianism has a rediscovery significance.This is not only a rebound from the active avoidance of this issue within Confucianism,but also a reflection of the value consciousness of responding to the challenges of Buddhism and Taoism to defend the fundamental spirit of Chinese culture.The entire process can be divided into three stages,namely,concern,confront,and transcend.Among them,the concern stage is mainly represented by Han Yu,Li Ao,and Zhou Dunyi from the perspective of the construction of Confucianism itself.This article attempts to explore how the three changed their attitudes and the inherent logic of responding to the issue of life and death,as well as the renewal of traditional Confucian students’view of death.On this basis,this article reveals the transformation of their role consciousness in responding to Buddhist challenges during the recent revival of Confucianism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.17.93