软科中国最好学科排名的局限与洞见  

Limitations and Insights of Best Chinese Subjects Rankings

作　　者：黄绍婧 覃莉 杨曦[3] HUANG Shaojing;QIN Li;YANG Xi

机构地区：[1]南宁师范大学教育科学学院,广西南宁530001 [2]广西医科大学发展规划处,广西南宁530021 [3]广西壮族自治区教育厅科研处,广西南宁530022

出　　处：《高教发展与评估》2024年第1期58-69,I0005,共13页Higher Education Development and Evaluation

摘　　要：软科中国最好学科排名作为一种第三方评价,在中国高等教育领域引起了广泛关注,但其应用的局限有待严格审视。当前软科排名存在失真的“长尾分布”、对人文社科评价的系统性偏差、人才培养维度指标的有效性和顶尖期刊选择的偏误等局限,但仍能为地方一流学科建设提供些许洞见,可以监测学科发展的“黑马”,呈现地方高校的优势学科领域,突出关键性指标“0的突破”的目标价值等,对地方高校一流学科发展监测、学科标杆选择、学科发展策略的制定等方面有一定的参考价值。While Best Chinese Subjects Ranking as a third-party ranking has attracted extensive attention in the field of higher education in China,the limitations of its application have rarely been strictly examined.At present,Best Chinese Subjects Rankings has some limitations,such as distorted“long tail distribution”,systematic deviation in the evaluation of humanities and social sciences,invalidity of indicators for teaching,and bias in the selection of top journals.However,it can still provide some insights,especially for local universities,in finding“dark horse”disciplines,showing competitive fields of local universities,suggesting the strategic significance of breakthrough key indicators,monitoring the development of local first-class disciplines,selecting discipline benchmarks and making discipline development strategy.

关 键 词：教育评价 软科中国最好学科排名 大学排名 学科建设 教育质量 

分 类 号：G640[文化科学—高等教育学]