中英美3国中学化学教材难度比较研究——原电池  

Comparison of the Difficulty of “Electrochemical Cell” in High School Chemistry Textbooks Among China, Britain and the United States

作　　者：童敏 樊敏[1] TONG Min;FAN Min(College of Chemistry and Materials Science,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu 610066,China)

机构地区：[1]四川师范大学化学与材料科学学院,四川成都610066

出　　处：《化学教育（中英文）》2024年第3期19-24,共6页Chinese Journal of Chemical Education

摘　　要：基于闫春更等人建立的“二维度四指标”教材难度评价模型,选取中、英、美3国现行高中教材为研究对象,就“原电池”内容的教材难度进行了测评与比较。研究发现在教材组织层面上,英版教材难度最小,中版教材难度较大;在内容表征层面上,中版教材难度最小,英版教材难度最大。并提出强化多重表征、渗透“电动势”相关概念等建议,为我国教材编写和课堂教学提供参考。Based on the difficulty evaluation model of“two dimensions and four indicators”established by Yan Chungeng,the current high school textbooks of China,Britain and the United States were selected as the research objects to evaluate and compare the difficulty of the“electrochemical cell”content.The study found that at the level of teaching material organization,the English textbook had the least difficulty,the Chinese version was more difficult;at the level of content representation,the Chinese version had the least difficulty,the English version was the most difficult.And this paper puts forward suggestions to strengthen multiple characterization,infiltrates the related concepts of“electric potential”,so as to provide reference for the compilation of China’s teaching materials and classroom teaching.

关 键 词：化学教材 原电池 难度比较 

分 类 号：G633.8[文化科学—教育学]