检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:毛菊[1] 王路路 MAO Ju;WANG Lulu(College of Educational Science,Xinjiang Normal University,Urumqi,Xinjiang 830017,China)
机构地区:[1]新疆师范大学教育科学学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830017
出 处:《河北师范大学学报(教育科学版)》2024年第2期111-117,共7页Journal of Hebei Normal University(Educational Science)
基 金:新疆维吾尔自治区高校科研计划建设类项目“新型城镇化中不同类型县城教师质量提升研究”(XJEDU2023J032)。
摘 要:日益严峻的人口老龄化对老年教育提出了更高的要求,发展城市老年教育是积极老龄化时代的应对策略。基于政策工具理论对现行有效的31份东部、中部、西部城市老年教育政策展开实证分析可以发现,城市老年教育政策工具呈现出结构性、组态性、区域性等特征,并在价值尺度上凸显制度正义,寻求内生能力,指向纳什均衡。鉴于城市老年教育政策工具表现出的特征与价值,未来要通过优化能力建设工具与系统变革工具,实现东部城市老年教育优质发展;优化激励性工具与系统变革工具,实现中部城市老年教育均衡发展;优化能力建设工具与激励性工具,实现西部城市老年教育兜底发展。The increasingly severe population aging sets higher requirements for elderly education.A coping strategy in the era of active aging is to develop urban elderly education.Based on the theory of policy instruments,this study conducts an empirical analysis of 31 urban elderly education policies currently effective in the eastern,central,and western regions.It is found that urban elderly education policy instruments are structural,configurable,and regional.They highlight institutional justice on the value scale,seek endogenous development,and are oriented toward Nash equilibrium.Given the characteristics and values of urban elderly education policy instruments,it is necessary to optimize capacity⁃building tools and system change tools in the future to achieve high⁃quality development of elderly education in the eastern cities;optimize incentive tools and system change tools to achieve balanced development of elderly education in central cities;optimize capacity building tools and incentive tools to achieve the bottom line development of elderly education in western cities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112