检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹杏田[1] 张丽华 葛明贵[3] CAO Xingtian;ZHANG Lihua;GE Minggui(Laboratory of Child Brain Science and Behavior,Tong Cheng Teachers College,Tongcheng,231400,Anhui Province,China;Psychology School,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian 116029,Liaoning Province,China;School of Educational Science,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241000,Anhui Province,China)
机构地区:[1]桐城师范高等专科学校儿童脑科学与行为实验室,安徽桐城231400 [2]辽宁师范大学心理学院,辽宁大连116029 [3]安徽师范大学教育科学学院,安徽芜湖241000
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2024年第3期240-246,共7页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:安徽省高校自然科学重点研究项目(KJ2020A0893,2022AH053016,SK2021A0902);职业教育提质培优培育行动计划国家级“教师教育类课程教学创新团队”培育项目。
摘 要:目的:探讨不同类型高自尊青少年自我服务偏向特征及差异。方法:选取1027青少年学生,采用罗森伯格自尊量表(RSES)筛选外显高自尊230人,内隐联想测验(IAT)测量内隐自尊,判为安全型高自尊和脆弱型高自尊青少年各36例,运用面孔工作记忆任务(FWM)开展2(不同自尊类型)×2(反馈类型)两因素混合实验设计研究。结果:不同类型高自尊青少年间自我服务偏向主效应有统计学意义[F(1,35)=85.41,P<0.001,η^(2)=0.23];安全型高自尊青少年在正确反馈[t(35)=-6.51,P<0.001,d=5.44]和错误反馈[t(35)=-10.79,P<0.001,d=6.50]条件下均没有表现出自我服务偏向;脆弱型高自尊青少年在正确反馈[t(35)=-2.85,P<0.05,d=2.50]条件下不存在自我服务偏向,错误反馈[t(35)=6.99,P<0.001,d=4.49]条件下存在自我服务偏向;高自尊类型与反馈类型之间存在交互作用[F(1,35)=28.65,P<0.001,η^(2)=0.14]。结论:脆弱型高自尊青少年错误反馈下表现出明显的自我服务偏向,高自尊异质性分化是青少年自我服务偏向差异形成的因素。Objective:To explore the features of self-serving bias among adolescents with different tspes of high self-esteem.Methods:A total of 1027 adolescents were sampled.Among them 230 adolescents with explicit high self-esteem were selected with the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale(RSES),36 adolescents with secure high self-esteem and 36 adolescents with fragile high self-esteem were selected with the Implicit Self-esteem Test(IAT).A 2×2 two factors mixed experimental design by using Face Working Memory Task was conducted to study the self-serving bias of 72 different high self-esteem adolescents.Results:The self-serving bias of different high self-esteem adolescents had statistically significance[F(1,35)=85.41,P<0.001,η~2=0.23].Secure high self-esteem adolescents did not show self-serving bias with correct[t(35)=-6.51,P<0.001,d=5.44]and wrong feedback[t(35)=-10.79,P 0.001,d=6.50].Similarly,fragile high self-esteem adolescents did not show self-serving bias with correct feedback[t(35)=-2.85,P<0.05,d=2.5],but they showed self-serving bias with wrong feedback[t(35)=6.99,P<0.001,d=4.49].The interaction between heterogeneous high self-esteem groups and feedback types was significant[F(1,35)=28.65,P<0.001,η~2=0.14].Conclusion:The adolescents with fragile high self-esteem show obvious self-serving bias with false feedback.The heterogeneity differentiation of high self-esteem is the factor for different self-serving bias among adolescents.
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学] B842.6[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145