检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐微洁 周家俊 Xu Weijie;Zhou Jiajun(Zhejiang Normal University,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江师范大学外国语学院
出 处:《日语学习与研究》2024年第2期99-108,共10页Journal of Japanese Language Study and Research
基 金:2021年度国家社会科学基金中华学术外译一般项目“现代汉语与中国现代文学”(批准号:21WZWB008)的阶段研究成果,项目主持人:徐微洁。
摘 要:口语流利性受环境影响的研究招募了84名中国日语学习者,将其分为两组:外语环境下的中国日语学习者(JFL)和二语环境下的中国日语学习者(JSL),并以其口语录音为语料,从时间、表达和语言三个维度,分析考察不同学习环境下中国日语学习者口语流利性的异同点。考察结果如下:(1)JFL与JSL在时间和表达维度上存在明显差异。JFL在时间维度上语速较快、停顿较短,但在表达维度上重复和更改更多。这可能源于学习者对不同环境感知的差异性和层次性。同时,也符合斯凯恩(Skehan)的“有限注意力假说”。(2)JFL与JSL在语言维度上无明显差异,两者都倾向于使用简单句进行描述,错误也大多源于动词变形和助词的选择。This study recruited 84 Japanese language learners in China and divided them into two groups based on their language learning environments: Japanese learners in the foreign language environment(JFL) and Japanese learners in the second language environment(JSL). The study used their spoken recordings as a corpus and analyzed the oral fluency of the learners from temporal, performing and linguistic dimensions. The aim was to examine the similarities and differences in the oral fluency of Japanese learners in different language learning environments. The results were as follows:(1) JFL and JSL learners showed significant differences in temporal and performing dimensions. JFL learners spoke faster and had shorter pauses, but more repetitions and changes in performing dimension. This may be due to differences in learners' perceptions of their language learning environments, which is consistent with Skehan's "Limited attentional capacity model".(2) There was no significant difference between JFL and JSL learners in the linguistic dimension. Both of them tended to use simple sentences for descriptions, and most errors were related to verb deformation and particles.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49